Legal Opinion
United States v. Gordon
United States Court of International Trade
Decided April 25, 1986No. 84-1-00074PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RESTANI, Judge:
Plaintiff-United States alleges that defendant-Stanley Gordon unlawfully introduced an automobile, attempted to introduce a second automobile, and aided or abetted in the introduction of a third automobile, into the commerce of the United States, 1 in violation of 19 U.S.C. §§ 1481, 1484, 1485 and 1592. 2 Accordingly, plaintiff seeks to have judgment entered against defendant for monetary penalties as provided for in 19 U.S.C. § 1592 (1982). 3 An action is also apparently pending in federal district court, in which plaintiff seeks to have a penalty imposed on this same…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- City of Newport v. Fact Concerts, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Baxter v. PalmigianoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Flemming v. NestorSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- North River Insurance Company, Inc. v. Peter StefanouCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Valley Steel Products Co.United States Court of International Trade · 1990
- United States v. Dantzler Lumber & Export Co.United States Court of International Trade · 1992
- United States v. Jac Natori Co.United States Court of International Trade · 1993
- United States v. Pan Pacific Textile Group, Inc.United States Court of International Trade · 2005
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.