Legal Opinion
United States v. Optrex America, Inc.
United States Court of International Trade
Decided June 9, 2008No. Slip Op. 08-63. Court No. 02-00646PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
BARZILAY, Judge.
These findings of fact and conclusions of law follow a bench trial held on June 5th and 6th, 2007, and represent the final chapter in a case that has endured more than its share of legal proceedings before the Court. 1 In this claim for penalties under 19 U.S.C. § 1592(a), Plaintiff United States (the “Government”) contends that Defendant Optrex America, Inc. (“Op-trex”) failed to exercise reasonable care in classifying certain Liquid Crystal Display products (“LCDs”) entered at various ports in the United States between October 12, 1997…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Complex MacHine Works Co.United States Court of International Trade · 1999
- United States v. Thorson Chemical Corp.United States Court of International Trade · 1992
- United States v. Modes, Inc.United States Court of International Trade · 1993
- Sharp Microelectronics Technology, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. Horizon Products International, Inc.United States Court of International Trade · 2015
- United States v. Deladiep, Inc.United States Court of International Trade · 2017
- United States v. International Trading Services, LLCUnited States Court of International Trade · 2017
- United States v. Horizon Products International, Inc.United States Court of International Trade · 2017
- United States v. Six Star Wholesale, Inc.United States Court of International Trade · 2019
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.