Legal Opinion

National Fire Ins. Co. v. Llewellyn

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 18, 1930No. 19297PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALL, C.

This was an action for a recovery on a policy of fire insurance. The plaintiff prevailed. Only two questions are present in this appeal: (1) Was the contract of insurance in existence before the loss? (2) To what extent or under what conditions may an insurance agent, even with certain express authority from his company, write insurance on his own property?

Cora Llewellyn and J. H. McBee were local agents of the National Fire Insurance Company of Hartford, Conn., for the purpose of writing and issuing policies of fire insurance. The general agent of this fire insurance company, as an…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Weatherholt v. National Liberty InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
  2. Muncey v. Security InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Bank of Glasco v. Springfield Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1897
  4. Fulkerson v. National Union Fire Ins.District Court, D. Montana · 1923

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bryant v. Country Life InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2006
  2. Cotton Mills v. . Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  3. Anderson Cotton Mills v. Royal Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  4. Burnes Nat. Bank v. Mueller-Keller Candy Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API