Bank of Glasco v. Springfield Fire & Marine Insurance
Court of Appeals of Kansas
Error from Cloud District Court. Hon. F. W. Sturges, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtWells, J.
For the decision of this case we deem it necessary to consider only the question whether, under the findings of fact made by the court, the plaintiff or the defendant should recover. In determining this question two important issues of law are distinctly raised.
First. Where the insured gave a quitclaim deed to the property, purporting to be an absolute conveyance but intended to be only a mortgage to secure the payment of debts, and no instrument of defeasance was executed, acknowledged and recorded, as provided by paragraph 3885, General Statutes of 1889, does such action forfeit an…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- R. L. McDonald & Co. v. KelloggSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
- Foote v. Hartford Fire InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
- Rockford Insurance v. WinfieldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1897
- Tomlinson v. Monmouth Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1859
3Cited by3 opinions
- Wolf v. Theresa Village Mutual Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
- Union Bank v. National Surety Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
- National Fire Ins. Co. v. LlewellynSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930