Legal Opinion

Cotton Mills v. . Manufacturing Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 24, 1942PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The case was tried before Judge Johnston, upon consent of the parties, without a jury.

The evidence tends to show that the plaintiff and appealing defendant had entered into a contract, subsisting at the time of the alleged transactions, whereby defendant agreed to receive and sell as agent of the plaintiff all the cotton waste from plaintiff's mills. The waste was produced by the mills in large quantities, and was of various kinds, designated by technical or trade names. The defendant was to receive as compensation an agreed percentage of the sales price — in some instances 5%, and others 6%.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Jones v. HabershamSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Wooden-Ware Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  3. Pine River Logging Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  4. Gardner v. . OgdenNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  5. Robertson v. ChapmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1894

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Sara Lee Corp. v. CarterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  2. Spence v. Spaulding and Perkins, Ltd.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  3. Vinson v. E. W. Buschman Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
  4. Honeycutt v. Farmers & Merchants BankCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
  5. Jay v. General Realties Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1946

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API