Legal Opinion

Fulkerson v. National Union Fire Ins.

District Court, D. Montana

Decided August 6, 1923No. 982PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOURQUIN, District Judge.

In this action on a hail insurance policy is no question of pleading, no conflict of evidence, and the facts are few and simple.

Plaintiff’s case in, defendant stands on a motion for judgment.

In 1921 plaintiff and one East, defendant’s special agent, executed a contract of agency (plaintiff for defendant), later by defendant approved.

They also discussed insurance of plaintiff’s contemplated crops, the finality being that plaintiff said if defendant would take his. note for the premium, he would let Past write the insurance. Past said he would submit the proposition to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pence v. LangdonSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Insurance Company v. LymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  3. Zimmermann v. Dwelling-House InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Insurance Co. v. LymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1872

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. National Fire Ins. Co. v. LlewellynSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  2. Burnes Nat. Bank v. Mueller-Keller Candy Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API