Anderson Cotton Mills v. Royal Manufacturing Co.

We endeavor to avoid repetition in the discussion of principles closely interrelated in considering the two appeals. For convenience, we discuss defendant’s appeal first.

DEFENDANT’S APPEAL.

The defendant’s objections to the evidence relate principally to the methods adopted by plaintiff in establishing the quantum of recovery for *507tbe value of tbe goods sold by defendant under tbe agency, or tbe proportionate amount of recovery tberefor.

We tbink, in tbe main, that these objections are rendered untenable, or at least made legally harmless to defendant, by reason of tbe findings of fact based…