Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Walter

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 13, 1984PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Yesawich, Jr., J.

In mid-May of 1980, claimant was separated from employment with the Columbia Rope Company in the City of Auburn, Cayuga County. Although there was work available for him at the time, he acceded to the layoff only because of advice from both his union and the employer that taking the layoff would protect his right to future trade readjustment allowance (TRA) benefits. He was idle *266for two weeks, during which time he received unemployment insurance benefits and some TRA benefits. On June 1, 1980, claimant returned to the rope company where he remained in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers v. DonovanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1983
  2. Skrundz v. Review Bd. of Ind. Employment SEC.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1983

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hurley v. Board of Review of the Industrial Commission of Utah, Department of Employment SecurityUtah Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Embaby v. Department of Jobs and TrainingCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  3. In re the Claim of StevensAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API