Legal Opinion
International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers v. Donovan
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 28, 1983No. Civ. A. 81-1954PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JOYCE HENS GREEN, District Judge.
The Trade Act of 1974, 19 U.S.C. § 2101 et seq. (Act), authorizes the payment of federally funded benefits, including trade readjustment allowances (TRA), to workers laid off because of a decline in sales or production by their firms because of competition from imports. 1 A worker is eligible to receive TRA benefits if he belongs to a group of workers certified by the Secretary of Labor (Secretary) as eligible to participate in the program and was employed by a single firm for 26 of the 52 weeks immediately preceding the layoff, at wages of…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Richards v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Gibson v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Southeastern Community College v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace, & Agricultural Implement Workers v. BrockSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hotel and Restaurant Employees Union, Local 25 v. William French Smith, U.S. Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
- Talberg v. Commissioner of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Gibbs v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1984
- International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. BrockCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.