Legal Opinion

Skrundz v. Review Bd. of Ind. Employment SEC.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 8, 1983No. 2-781A241PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEAL, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE FACTS

This is an appeal by claimants-appellants John B. Skrundz, et al. 1 (Claimants), representing 71 present and former bricklayer employees of respondent-appellee Inland Steel Company, Indiana Harbor Works, East Chicago, Indiana, (Inland) whose claims for trade readjustment allowance benefits (TRA) under the Federal Trade Act of 1974, 19 U.S.C. § 2271 et seq. (Act), were denied by the respondent-appellee Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security Division (Agency or Review Board). The Agency is a cooperating state agency which administers this federal…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Rosemary Fortin v. F. Ray Marshall, Secretary, Department of Labor, United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
  2. Hazel Paden v. U. S. Department of Labor and the Secretary of the Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
  3. Marozsan v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security DivisionIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Hagood v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. Anderson v. Review Board of Indiana Employment Security DivisionIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hurley v. Board of Review of the Industrial Commission of Utah, Department of Employment SecurityUtah Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Bouchard v. State Emps. Ret. Comm'nSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2018
  3. In re the Claim of WalterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  4. Glover v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  5. State Board of Tax Commissioners v. SmithIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API