Legal Opinion

Embaby v. Department of Jobs and Training

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 23, 1986No. C2-86-1261PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FORSBERG, Judge.

A Commissioner’s representative from the Department of Jobs and Training determined that relator, Farouk Embaby, should not receive trade adjustment allowances under the Trade Act of 1974 because he was not separated from employment due to a lack of work. We affirm.

FACTS

Farouk Embaby began working for Magnetic Peripherals, Inc. in 1981. In April 1984, he began experiencing adverse physical reactions when a new chemical was placed in open vats near his work area. He went to the employer’s physician, who concluded that Embaby’s symptoms were consistent with chemical…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Tennessee Valley Authority v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. White v. Metropolitan Medical CenterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  3. Howe v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Sneaker Circus, Inc. v. CarterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
  5. Talberg v. Commissioner of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Glover v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Nelson v. Commissioner of Employment & Economic DevelopmentCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
  3. Sinykin v. Commissioner of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
  4. Tamara S. Jamnick, Relator v. Range Mental Health Center, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic DevelopmentCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API