Legal Opinion
Federal Deposit Insurance v. Collins
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided March 8, 1996No. Civil A. 3:94CV01318 (TFGD)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STRIKE THE FOURTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE (# 65)
EAGAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
The plaintiff, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver of Mechanics and Farmers Savings Bank FSB, moves pursuant to Federal Rule 12(f), to strike the fourth defense raised by the defendants, Vincent M. Simko and Simko & Elstein, P.C. For the following reasons, the FDIC’s motion to strike is GRANTED.
I. BACKGROUND
The FDIC seeks to recover in excess of $2.2 million dollars in damages sustained by the now defunct Mechanics and Farmers Savings Bank from fifteen former…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, in Its Corporate Capacity v. Gus S. Mijalis, and Gus S. MijalisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. IshamDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1992
- Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. BakerDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1990
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Gilbert BiermanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Uniroyal, Inc. v. HellerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1974
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- National Credit Union Administration v. First Union Capital Markets Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1999
- Bolduc v. Beal Bank, SSBDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1998
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. HainesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1997
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. Arrillaga-TorrénsDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2016
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. HealeyDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.