Legal Opinion
Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Baker
District Court, C.D. California
Decided June 18, 1990No. SA CV 89-386 AHS (RWRx)PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ MOTIONS TO STRIKE AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES
STOTLER, District Judge.
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, in its capacity as managing agent for the Resolution Trust Corporation acting in its corporate capacity (RTC), instituted this action on June 9, 1989, asserting jurisdiction under 28 U.S.Code sections 1345, 1331, 12 U.S.Code section 1819, the doctrine of pendent jurisdiction, and Section 501 of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act of 1989 Public Law No. 101-73 (FIRREA or 1989…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Marcelino Roldan FonsecaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
- First State Bank of Hudson County v. The United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
- Federal Sav. and Loan Ins. Corp. v. BurdetteDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1989
- FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION v. CarlsonDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1988
- In Re Franklin Nat. Bank Securities LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1978
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. NibloDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1993
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, in Its Corporate Capacity v. Larry O. Hulsey, an Individual Larry O. Hulsey & Co., a Texas Corporation, Defendants-Third Party v. Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Company of Chicago, a National Banking Corporation, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. IshamDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1992
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. HulseyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- American Casualty Co. v. BakerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.