Legal Opinion
Federal Deposit Insurance v. Haines
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided September 9, 1997No. Civ. 3:94CV0473 (AVC)PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON PARTIAL MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
COVELLO, Chief Judge.
This is an action for damages in which the plaintiff, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”), as the receiver for the Landmark Bank (“Landmark”), alleges that the defendants, Robert Haines, et al, were negligent, grossly negligent, and breached their fiduciary duty with respect to their management and operation of the failed bank. It is brought pursuant to the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act of 1989 (“FIRREA”), Pub.L. 101-73,108 Stat. 183. On March 1,1997, the FDIC filed the within motion…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. GaubertSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Chillemi v. Town of SouthamptonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- National Credit Union Administration v. First Union Capital Markets Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1999
- Resolution Trust Corp. v. Massachusetts Mutual Life InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2000
- Hartford Fire Insurance v. Annapolis Bay Charters, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1999
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. Arrillaga-TorrénsDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2016
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.