Legal Opinion
Federal Deposit Insurance v. Healey
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided January 15, 1998No. 3:91CV00342 GLGPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GOETTEL, District Judge.
Plaintiff, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”), as Receiver for Hou-satonie Bank & Trust Company (“HBT”), has filed an objection to Magistrate Judge Smith’s Recommended Ruling dated October 22, 1997, which denied the FDIC’s Motion to Strike the affirmative defenses asserted by defendants David A. Einbinder and Joel M. Young (“defendants”). In reversing his earlier decision on the Motion to Strike, the Magistrate adopted the holding of this Court in FDIC v. Haines, Slip Op., No. 3:94CV0473(AVC) — F.Supp. - [1997 WL 880675] (Ruling on Partial Motion…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. GaubertSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Boyle v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- National Credit Union Administration v. First Union Capital Markets Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1999
- Marion, D. v. Bryn Mawr Trust Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. GladstoneDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1999
- Resolution Trust Corp. v. Massachusetts Mutual Life InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2000
- Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. OrnsteinDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.