Legal Opinion

Bolduc v. Beal Bank, SSB

District Court, D. New Hampshire

Decided February 3, 1998No. 1:17-adr-00007PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

MUIRHEAD, United States Magistrate Judge.

Plaintiffs Lionel and Maureen Bolduc brought suit to prevent foreclosure upon their home, owned by Maureen Bolduc, and a parcel of undeveloped land owned jointly by them. According to the terms of a 1991 Forbearance Agreement, the home and land provide additional security through “blanket” second mortgages for two 1987 notes upon which plaintiffs had defaulted. Plaintiffs contend that the 1987 notes and 1991 Forbearance Agreement are invalid in whole or part. Plaintiffs moved for a temporary restraining order (document no. 3). At a hearing held on…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Bull v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. O'Melveny & Myers v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Coit Independence Joint Venture v. Federal Savings & Loan InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Narragansett Indian Tribe v. Paul E. GuilbertCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Drouin v. American Home Mortgage et al.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2012
  2. Galvin v. EMC Mortgage Corp.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2014
  3. In re Estate of Muriel R. MillsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2014
  4. Westbrooks v. FNB United Corp. (In Re Westbrooks)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2010
  5. Galvin v. EMC Mortgage Corp.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2014

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API