Legal Opinion

Van v. Language Line Services

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 24, 2017No. H041459PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RUSHING, P. J.—

Introduction

In this employment case, plaintiff and appellant Nathalie Thuy Van (Van) challenges a trial court’s order sanctioning her and finding her in contempt. The trial court found that Van had disobeyed a prior court order by refusing to attend a deposition noticed by defendant and respondent LanguageLine Solutions (LanguageLine) and had engaged in other discovery violations relating to her deposition. However, the prior court order Van was found to have disobeyed did not order her to attend a deposition and it was not issued as a result of a motion to compel. It…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hotaling v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Arthur v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Britts v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  4. Tucker v. PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SERVICESCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  5. Board of Supervisors v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Daniel Mora Mendoza v. W.J. SullivanDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2021
  2. Houser v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2025
  3. Khodayari v. Escandari CA2/7California Court of Appeal · 2020
  4. Masimo Corporation v. The Vanderpool Law Firm, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2024
  5. Moore v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API