Legal Opinion

Moman v. Walden

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided August 6, 1986PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LEWIS, Judge.

Plaintiff Lincoln W. Moman filed his complaint against defendant, Commerce Union Bank (Bank), and sought to set aside a “Suretyship Agreement” he and his wife, third-party defendant Toni Wine Moman (Mrs. Moman), had signed guaranteeing $150,000 of a $300,000 debt of Triad Entertainment Corporation (Triad).

Both Momans alleged they signed the “Suretyship Agreement” under economic duress. Moman also sued Phil Walden, a co-owner of the corporation, who had, along with Walden’s wife, signed a separate “Suretyship Agreement.” Moman sought contribution and indemnity from Walden.

Th…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. MacDonald, Sommer & Frates v. Yolo CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. French v. ShoemakerSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  4. Crocker v. SchneiderCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1984

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Byrd v. HallTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Dooley v. EverettCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1990
  3. Armes Ex Rel. Armes v. HulettCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1992
  4. Blair v. Allied Maintenance Corp.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1988
  5. Caledonia Leasing & Equipment Co. v. Armstrong, Allen, Braden, Goodman, McBride & PrewittCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1992

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API