Dodd v. Maddox
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.
Plaintiff brought this action as the assignee of certain materialmen to recover upon a builder’s bond given for the benefit of the owners and, also, for all persons performing labor upon or furnishing materials to be used in the work described in the contract referred to in said bond, at the request of the contractor therein named. The bond also provided that it should inure to the benefit of all persons performing labor or furnishing materials to be used in the work contracted to be performed; that recovery might be had upon said bond in any suit brought to foreclose liens on the premises…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- McMenomy v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Hubbard v. JurianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
- General Electric Co. v. American Bonding Co. of BaltimoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Hollenbeck-Bush Planing Mill Co. v. AmwegCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Watterson v. Owens River Canal Co.California Court of Appeal · 1914
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Culbertson v. CizekCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Electrical Electronic Control, Inc. v. Los Angeles Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005