Hollenbeck-Bush Planing Mill Co. v. Amweg
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.
It has been stipulated that one transcript be used in the appeals from the judgment in these consolidated actions.
The appellants, except R. Bradley and Bradley Company (appellants in the appeal numbered Sac. 2470), are material-men or laborers who commenced separate actions for the foreclosure of mechanics’ liens upon certain real property in the city of Porterville, Tulare County. Bradley Company is the owner of the property on which is the building for the construction of which the liens were asserted. Defendant, P. J. Amweg (doing business as F. J. Amweg Company) was the contractor who…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Edwards v. KearzeySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- City of Pasadena v. StimsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Greenwood v. Freight Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Provident Institution for Savings v. Mayor of Jersey CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Denny v. BennettSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Lelande v. LoweryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Roberts v. Security Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Ryan v. ShannahanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Hub Hardware Co. v. Aetna Accident & Liab. Co.California Supreme Court · 1918
- Hazard, Gould & Co. v. RosenbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.