Legal Opinion

United States v. Gustavo Valdez-Soto, United States of America v. Fabio Gomez-Tello

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 10, 1994No. 91-10622, 91-10623PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Judge KOZINSKI; Dissent by Judge ZILLY.

KOZINSKI, Circuit Judge.

There may be no loyalty among thieves, but there sometimes is among drug dealers. When called by the government, such witnesses occasionally change their story. The principal issue raised in these consolidated appeals is whether and when their inculpato-ry out-of-court statements may be admitted in the teeth of a hearsay objection.

I

Some days nothing goes right. The seller, Roberto Cortez, showed up in a restaurant parking lot with nine kilograms of cocaine just as he’d promised, only to discover that his buyer, Dennis…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Douglas v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Idaho v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Kentucky v. StincerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. United States v. OwensSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Standefer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. United States v. BondsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  2. Fowler v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Clark v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
  4. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jeffrey D. RANDALL, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  5. Joseph Anthony Padilla v. Cal A. TerhuneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API