Fowler v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
BOEHM, Justice.
Under the recent decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36, 124 S.Ct. 1354, 158 L.Ed.2d 177 (2004), a prior testimonial statement is admissible against the defendant in a criminal prosecution only if the person who makes the statement is available for cross-examination either before the trial or at the trial. We hold that a witness who takes the stand but refuses to answer questions with no claim of privilege is available until the witness refuses to answer after being ordered to do so.
Not surprisingly, this issue, like the scope…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Reynolds v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Bush v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2008
- Boatner v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
- State v. PriceWashington Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. PriceWashington Supreme Court · 2006
- Nathan S. Berkman v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.