Legal Opinion

Fowler v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 2005No. 49S02-0412-CR-509PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOEHM, Justice.

Under the recent decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36, 124 S.Ct. 1354, 158 L.Ed.2d 177 (2004), a prior testimonial statement is admissible against the defendant in a criminal prosecution only if the person who makes the statement is available for cross-examination either before the trial or at the trial. We hold that a witness who takes the stand but refuses to answer questions with no claim of privilege is available until the witness refuses to answer after being ordered to do so.

Not surprisingly, this issue, like the scope…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Reynolds v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1879

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Bush v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Boatner v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. State v. PriceWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State v. PriceWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Nathan S. Berkman v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API