Legal Opinion
United States v. Bonds
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 11, 2010No. 09-10079PublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge SCHROEDER; Dissent by Judge BEA.
SCHROEDER, Circuit Judge:
In 2001, Barry Bonds hit 73 home runs for the San Francisco Giants. Also in 2001, as well as in prior and succeeding years, BALCO Laboratories, Inc. in San Francisco recorded, under the name “Barry Bonds,” positive results of urine and blood tests for performance enhancing drugs. In 2003, Bonds swore under oath he had not taken performance enhancing drugs, so the government is now prosecuting him for perjury. But to succeed it must prove the tested samples BALCO recorded actually came from Barry Bonds. Hence, this…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. HinksonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Anna Harris v. Edna Itzhaki Rafael ItzhakiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Yokoyama v. Midland National Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. FIGGIE INTERNATIONAL, INC., Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Jones v. Royal Admin. Servs., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Mavrix Photographs, LLC v. Livejournal, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Van Zandt v. Mbunda (In Re Mbunda)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Cruz v. Farmers InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2022
- Thomas v. Taco Bell Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2012
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.