Legal Opinion
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jeffrey D. RANDALL, Defendant-Appellant
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 11, 1998No. 97-10108PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUG, Chief Judge:
Appellant Jeffrey Randall (“Randall”) appeals his conviction and sentence for nine counts of mail fraud, nine counts of wire fraud, and one count of conspiracy to commit mail fraud and wire fraud arising from a telemarketing scheme. Randall challenges his conviction based on the argument that the district court should have granted a mistrial because there was government misconduct during the summation. Randall challenges his sentence on two grounds. First, he argues that the district court should not have applied a two level “vulnerable victim” enhancement under the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. Michael Carl VismanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Morris D. ENGLISH, Jr., Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. George Patrick CharmleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Gustavo Valdez-Soto, United States of America v. Fabio Gomez-TelloCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- United States v. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. SarkisianCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jorge VENCES, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Frido SeesingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Jay R. Bishop, United States of America v. Gene R. CardenazCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.