Legal Opinion
O'NEIL v. Kelly
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided February 6, 1976No. 45774, 45827PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Per curiam
The two appeals decided by this opinion arise from the same lawsuit and therefore have been consolidated for purposes of decision.
Plaintiff commenced this lawsuit in November 1972 against attorneys Fallon Kelly, Hyam Segell, and William S. Fallon, claiming that they had negligently represented him during divorce proceedings in 1965, 1966, and 1967. In October 1974, after discovery was completed, defendants Segell and Fallon moved for summary judgment, a motion which the trial court granted on December 19, 1974. On January 6, 1975, the day set for trial of the remaining defendant, plaintiff…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ahlm v. RooneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- Rosvall v. ProvostSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
- Erickson v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- O'NEIL v. SwanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- O'NEIL v. CorrickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
3Cited by6 opinions
- Doe v. Archdiocese of Saint Paul & MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- Musicland Group, Inc. v. Ceridian Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- Continental Sales & Equipment Co. v. Town of StuntzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Naegele Outdoor Advertising Co. of Minneapolis v. City of LakevilleCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- Thofson v. Redex Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.