Thofson v. Redex Industries, Inc.

OPINION

NIERENGARTEN, Judge.

The appellants argue the district court erroneously concluded damage to com and other property caused by a fire in a grain dryer did not constitute damage to “other property” and assert the economic loss resulting from the fire was not a “reasonable economic expectation.” The appellants also contend the court improperly granted summary judgment on their negligent misrepresentation claim. We affirm.

FACTS

Appellants Virgil and Arlene Thofson purchased a grain dryer manufactured by Redex Industries, Inc. (Redex), the corporate predecessor of respondent Blount…