Legal Opinion

Erickson v. Nelson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 25, 1966No. 40262PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant’s motion to dismiss this appeal must be granted.

Plaintiff brought suit against defendant for specific performance of the following written instrument signed by both parties:

“This is an agreement between L. H. Nelson to sell his 160 acre farm 2 miles South of Kerkhoven to Wilton Erickson for the sum of $205 per acre on the basis of 160 acres. This day of Oct. 16, 1963. The seller to provide clear title and pay the 1963 real estate taxes. The buyer to pay down $500 until the deal is completed.”

Defendant answered on March 18, 1964. Notice of lis pendens was not filed until April 26,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bulau v. BulauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
  2. Williams v. StewartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1879
  3. Rahm v. CummingsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  4. Royal Realty Co. v. LevinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  5. Leslie v. MathwigSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Kirby v. KirbyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Bonhiver v. Fugelso, Porter, Simich & Whiteman, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  3. O'NEIL v. KellySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  4. Brownlee v. ErtzosSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  5. Asmus v. OuradaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API