Legal Opinion
United States v. William Michael Furman
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided May 15, 1997No. 18-4058PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN C. PORFILIO, Circuit Judge.
Defendant appeals from a district court order dismissing his “First Amendment Rights Petition to Government to Redress Grievances; and Motion to Reduce and/or Vacate Sentence under Rule 35 of Rules of Criminal Procedure, and/or Rules 11, 32 and 33 of Rules of Criminal Procedure.” Initially, this seventy-six page pleading mixed a wide variety of heterogeneous claims. Shortly after filing, however, defendant asked the district court to pare it down to a proper Rule 35 motion by dismissing without prejudice all claims implicating such other remedial mechanisms as…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- John Badea v. Harvey CoxCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Miguel SandovalCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Richard Bruce CoxCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. John R. MazakCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Marcus Allan McIntosh v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- Renner v. Harsco CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. AveryCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. DuranCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. HurlichCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.