Legal Opinion
Giordano v. Giordano
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 5, 1995No. 12570PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDupont, C. J.
The defendant appeals from the judgment of the trial court granting a prejudgment attachment of his real property in the amount of $225,000. The defendant claims that the attachment was improper because (1) the statute of limitations, General Statutes § 52-577d,1 which governs civil actions for damages for injury to a minor as a result of sexual abuse, is unconstitutional, (2) General Statutes § 52-278d, as applied to defendants in tort actions, is unconstitutional, (3) the plaintiffs failed to establish damages with reasonable certainty, and (4) § 52-577d abrogates the right to present the…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Connecticut v. DoehrSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Berry v. LoiseauSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Carrano v. Yale-New Haven HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Doe v. Norwich Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- John H. Kolb & Sons, Inc. v. G & L Excavating, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Torringford Farms Ass'n v. City of TorringtonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Middletown Commercial Associates Ltd. Partnership v. City of MiddletownConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.