Legal Opinion
Connecticut National Bank v. L & R Realty
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided March 5, 1996No. 14968PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLavery, J.
The plaintiff in this foreclosure action moves to dismiss the defendants’ appeal for lack of a final judgment on the basis of the trial court’s failure to set law days. We agree with the plaintiff that the setting of law days is necessary for a final judgment to exist in a strict foreclosure action and therefore grant the motion to dismiss.
The following facts are necessary for the disposition of this motion. L & R Realty, a general partnership, executed a note and mortgage to the plaintiff. Following L & R Realty’s default on the note, the plaintiff1 brought this action to foreclose its…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. CurcioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- STRORINEY v. Crescent Lake Tax DistrictSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Morici v. JarvieSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
- Barclays Bank of New York v. IvlerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. VollConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- L & R Realty v. Connecticut National BankConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Willow Funding Co., L.P. v. Grencom AssociatesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Benvenuto v. MahajanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Sovereign Bank v. LicataConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
- Yankee Millwork Sash & Door Co. v. BienkowskiConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.