Legal Opinion

Robinson v. Alameda County

District Court, N.D. California

Decided June 21, 2012No. C 12-00730(JCS)PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING TOY AND ROBINSON’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND GRANTING TOY’S MOTION TO STRIKE PLAINTIFF’S FIFTH CAUSE OF ACTION FOR DEFAMATION

JOSEPH C. SPERO, United States Magistrate Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Defendants Herbert Robinson (“Robinson”) and Michael Toy (“Toy”) have filed a *1033Motion To Dismiss For Failure To State A Claim [F.R.C.P. 12(b)(6) ] (“Motion to Dismiss”). Defendant Toy has separately filed a Special Motion To Strike Plaintiffs Claim For Defamation [Cal. Civ. Proc. § 425.16] (“Motion to Strike”). The parties have consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge pursuant to 28…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  5. In Re Gilead Sciences Securities LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Ramachandran v. City of L. AltosDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2019
  2. Elbert v. YoungNebraska Supreme Court · 2022
  3. Resolute Forest Prods., Inc. v. Greenpeace Int'lDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2017
  4. (PC) Daniels v. BaerDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
  5. (PC) Faultry v. SaechaoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API