Gleason v. Fire Protection Engineering Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
A general demurrer filed by respondents to appellant’s second amended complaint was sustained, following which a judgment of dismissal was entered.
According to the complaint, respondent Clifford was doing business under the name of Fire Protection Engineering Co. The Townsend Co., a corporation, which was joined as a defendant, was the owner of a certain building in San Francisco which was leased to Baker, Hamilton and Pacific Co., a corporation. Plaintiff was an employee of the company last named. For some time prior to September 28, 1929, respondents were engaged in repairing a…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Means v. Southern California Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1904
- Young v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1920
- Gett v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1923
- Haddad v. McDowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Katz v. HelbingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Scott v. George A. Fuller Co.California Court of Appeal · 1940
- Hamilton v. BoydSupreme Court of Iowa · 1934
- Dickison v. LaThorpeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Wallace v. KingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Page v. Cudahy Packing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1939
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.