Hamilton v. Boyd
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
Claussen, J.-
I. In an instruction on contributory-negligence the court told the jury that contributory negligence was ■such act or omission to act on the part of plaintiff as amounts to a want of ordinary care which contributes proximately in any way or in any degree directly in- producing the injury complained of. Proximate cause was defined as being the moving or producing cause without' which the injury would not' havé occurred.' The instruction on contributory negligence is erroneous. When reád in connection, whh the instruction on proximate cause, it is. clearly prejudicial. The…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Gornstein v. PriverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- E. N. Albert v. Maher Brothers' Transfer Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1932
- Oppenheim v. BarkinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
- Woodson v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1909
- Hogan v. NesbitSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Hackman v. BeckwithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1954
- Grenz v. WerreNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1964
- Hoekstra v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1986
- Mast v. Illinois Cent. R. Co.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1948
- East Hampton Dewitt Corporation and General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corporation v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company A/K/A State Farm Insurance Companies, Defendant-Appellee-Appellant. Warner National, Inc., and Utica Mutual Insurance Company v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company A/K/A State Farm Insurance Companies, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, and Third-Party v. Maurice L. Rosen, Third-Party State Farm Insurance Company, and Third-Party v. East Hampton Dewitt Corporation, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.