Legal Opinion

Peterson v. Pallis

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 16, 1918No. 14779PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Smith, J., entered December 12,1917, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in an action in tort.

1Opinion of the CourtChadwick, J.

— This action arises out of a collision between plaintiff’s motor-cycle and defendant’s automobile. Trial was had, resulting in a verdict in favor of plaintiff.

It will be necessary to notice but two assignments of error. The first is that the court erred in overruling the motion to strike certain matter from the amended complaint, and thereafter erred in denying defendant’s motion to make the complaint more definite and certain. Plaintiff alleges:

“That said accident happened more particularly as follows, to wit: the plaintiff is in the employ of the Seattle Construction and Dry Dock Co., as a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hartley v. LasaterWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Segerstrom v. LawrenceWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Sheffield v. Union Oil Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Wallis v. NaumanWyoming Supreme Court · 1945
  2. McCoy v. KrengelIdaho Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Hunt v. Whitlock's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935
  4. Moore v. Dresden Investment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Price v. GabelWashington Supreme Court · 1931

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API