Legal Opinion

Price v. Gabel

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1931No. 22439. En BancPublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

In this action, the appellant, Price, sought to recover in damages against the respondents Gabel for personal injuries inflicted upon him, as he alleged, by the negligent operation of an automobile of the respondents. A general demurrer was interposed to! his complaint, which the trial court sustained. He refused to plead further, whereupon the court entered a judgment dismissing his action. The appeal is from the judgment so entered. The ultimate question presented by the appeal is, therefore: Does the complaint state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action?

The allegations of the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hillebrant v. ManzWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Keller v. BrenemanWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Anderson v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  4. Johnson v. J. C. HeitmanWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Twedt v. Seattle Taxicab Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1922

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Young v. Caravan CorporationWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Gallegher v. DavisSuperior Court of Delaware · 1936
  3. Portland-Seattle Auto Freight, Inc. v. JonesWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Everest v. RieckenWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Garner v. Pacific Coast Coal Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1940

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API