Legal Opinion

Hunt v. Whitlock's Administrator

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided April 30, 1935PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Richardson

Affirming.

To recover damages for the death of O. J. Whitlock, the administrator of his estate brought an action against Frank M. Hunt and E. R. Holtzclaw, partners doing business under the. firm name of Hunt & Holtzclaw, and Frank M. Hunt, individually. James Coyle and Albert Lane also instituted their separate actions against them to recover damages for injuries they had respectively sustained in the same accident.

They were consolidated and tried as one. The issues were formed by appropriate pleadings, and, on a trial to a jury, a verdict was returned…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Singer Manufacturing Co. v. RahnSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. American Savings Life Insurance v. RiplingerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
  3. Leonard v. HeyMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Utilities Appliance Co. v. Toon's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  5. Williams v. National Cash Register Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Wallis v. NaumanWyoming Supreme Court · 1945
  2. O'Neil Hearn v. Bray's Adm'xCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936
  3. Dr. Pepper Company v. HeimanWyoming Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Thronton v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936
  5. Wathen v. MacKeyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1945

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API