Legal Opinion

Segerstrom v. Lawrence

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 22, 1911No. 9430PublishedCited by 29 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Peck, J., entered November 26, 1910, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in an action for personal injuries sustained by a pedestrian through a collision with an automobile.

1Opinion of the CourtPuiajeeton, J.

The respondent, while walking across Main avenue, in the city of Spokane, collided with, or was run into and injured by, the appellant, who was driving an automobile. He brought this action to recover for the injury sustained. On a trial by jury a verdict and judgment was returned and entered in his favor, and this appeal followed.

The appellant complains that the evidence was insufficient to justify the verdict, but it is clear there was a case for the jury. The evidence on the part of the respondent tended to show that the collision occurred sometime after nine o’clock in the evening; that…

2Cited by29 opinions

  1. Morrison v. ClarkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  2. Hartley v. LasaterWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Billington v. SchaalWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Reynolds v. DonohoWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Johnson v. J. C. HeitmanWashington Supreme Court · 1915

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API