Legal Opinion
Lauer v. Zoning Commission
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided August 11, 1998No. SC 15680PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NORCOTT, J.
The original certified issue in this appeal was: “Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court’s judgment was untimely under General Statutes § 51-183b,2 and that the untimeliness was not waived?” Lauer v. Zoning Commission, 241 Conn. 902, 903, 693 A.2d 304 (1997). After this court published *253a written decision resolving that issue; see Lauer v. Zoning Commission, 243 Conn. 485, 705 A.2d 195 (1998); the defendants filed a joint motion to reconsider and to correct the rescript. That motion was granted and, at the same time, this court, sua sponte, expanded…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United Illuminating Co. v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- State v. PayneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- State v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- State v. RiosConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Leo Fedus & Sons Construction Co. v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Murphy v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Statewide Grievance Committee v. BurtonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- New Milford Savings Bank v. JajerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Boris v. Garbo Lobster Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Dornemann v. DornemannConnecticut Superior Court · 2004
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.