Amyot v. Luchini
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COMPTON, Chief Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
The superior court held that a state statute requiring good faith disclosure of defects in residential real property transfers precludes a buyer from recovering from a seller under the theory of innocent misrepresentation. We affirm.
II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS
Robin Luchini and Sharon Luchini owned a house on Penrose Lane in Fairbanks. In preparation for the sale of the house, the Luchinis hired Kenneth Rydberg, a professional engineer, to inspect it. In an August 1993 letter, Rydberg opined that “the foundation is stable and the floor framing is…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- Adamson v. University of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
- Sprague v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- Cousineau v. WalkerAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
- Bevins v. BallardAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Engelhart v. KramerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Robinson v. GrossmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Laybourn v. City of WasillaAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
- Diblik v. MarcyAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
- Hogan v. AdamsAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.