Legal Opinion

Amyot v. Luchini

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 1997No. S-7170PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COMPTON, Chief Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

The superior court held that a state statute requiring good faith disclosure of defects in residential real property transfers precludes a buyer from recovering from a seller under the theory of innocent misrepresentation. We affirm.

II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

Robin Luchini and Sharon Luchini owned a house on Penrose Lane in Fairbanks. In preparation for the sale of the house, the Luchinis hired Kenneth Rydberg, a professional engineer, to inspect it. In an August 1993 letter, Rydberg opined that “the foundation is stable and the floor framing is…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Adamson v. University of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Sprague v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Cousineau v. WalkerAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Bevins v. BallardAlaska Supreme Court · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Engelhart v. KramerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Robinson v. GrossmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  3. Laybourn v. City of WasillaAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Diblik v. MarcyAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Hogan v. AdamsAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API