Legal Opinion
Robinson v. Grossman
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 13, 1997No. D020486PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KREMER, P. J.
This case stems from the sale of a home by John E. Helm 1 and Anne Marie Grossman to Mark S. Robinson and Susan K. Robinson. The Robinsons appeal a judgment entered after Grossman, Prudential California Realty, the listing broker, and its agent Marti Gellens-Stubbs obtained defense verdicts. The Robinsons contend the court misunderstood the disclosure duties of a seller’s real estate agent to prospective purchasers, and as a result incorrectly excluded expert witness testimony and refused jury instructions on the issue. They also contend the court abused its discretion in…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Panopulos v. MaderisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Easton v. StrassburgerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Salahutdin v. Valley of California, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1994
- Royster v. MontanezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- Bevins v. BallardAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- JRS Products, Inc. v. Matsushita Electric Corp. of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Evans v. CENTERSTONE DEVELOPMENT CO.California Court of Appeal · 2005
- Assilzadeh v. California Federal BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- In Re Marriage of FeldmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Peake v. UnderwoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.