Legal Opinion

Reuter v. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 19, 1935No. Civ. 9682PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCOTT, J., pro tem.

This is an appeal by defendant from a judgment in favor of plaintiff on certain policies of disability insurance.

In November of 1923, upon application of plaintiff, defendant issued to him four policies of disability insurance, each providing benefits of $100 a month. In March of 1928 plaintiff notified defendant that he was permanently and totally disabled, declaring that he was at that time suffering from syphilis. Defendant refused to pay, asserting that plaintiff was thus afflicted when the policy was applied for and his concealment of the fact was fraudulent. Plaintiff…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lattin v. GilletteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Robinson v. Exempt Fire Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Brix v. Peoples Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Hudgins v. Standard Oil Co. of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  5. Baker v. Eilers Music Co.California Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sethman v. BulkleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Zingheim v. MarshallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  3. Dillon v. Board of Pension CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Sethman v. BulkleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API