Sethman v. Bulkley
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.
The principal question involved in this case is whether a letter written by the mother of the plaintiff stating that she had arranged with his two sisters, the defendants, to pay to him certain money upon her death was admissible in evidence against the two sisters to show a promise on their part to pay to the brother said sums of money. The mother on February 18, 1926, executed and delivered two deeds in which she conveyed by one of said deeds the title to certain real property in San Francisco to one of the defendants and by the other she conveyed another piece of real property to the other…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cooney v. GlynnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Smith v. LombardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Brix v. Peoples Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Rogers v. Manhattan Life Insurance Co. of New YorkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Cobb v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Airola v. GorhamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Orella v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Williamson v. KinneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Horton v. KyburzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Bos v. United States Rubber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1950
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.