Legal Opinion

Sethman v. Bulkley

California Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1937No. S. F. 15358Published

1Opinion of the Court

9 Cal.2d 21 (1937)

CHARLES J. SETHMAN, Respondent,

v.

LAVINA F. BULKLEY et al., Appellants.

S. F. No. 15358.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

May 26, 1937.

G. H. Van Harvey and Harold E. Haven for Appellants.

Morris, Jaffa & Sumski for Respondent.

CURTIS, J.

The principal question involved in this case is whether a letter written by the mother of the plaintiff stating that she had arranged with his two sisters, the defendants, to pay to him certain money upon her death was admissible in evidence against the two sisters to show a promise on their part to pay to the brother said sums of money. The…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Cooney v. GlynnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Smith v. LombardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Brix v. Peoples Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Lissak v. Crocker Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Rogers v. Manhattan Life Insurance Co. of New YorkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API