Legal Opinion
Handy v. Lane County
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided November 4, 2015No. 161213685; A153507PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGarrett, P. J.
Plaintiff appeals a judgment that dismissed his claims against defendants for violations of the Public Meetings Law, ORS 192.610 -192.690. Plaintiff alleges that defendants Lane County and three of the county’s commissioners violated the Public Meetings Law by meeting in private for the purpose of deliberating toward a decision and by holding an emergency meeting without issuing minutes and without either giving 24-hour notice or justifying the lack of notice. Defendants moved to strike plaintiffs claims under ORS 31.150, Oregon’s anti-SLAPP statute, which the trial court granted. For the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
- Stull v. HokeOregon Supreme Court · 1997
- Roberts v. City of PalmdaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Staten v. SteelCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Handy v. Lane CountyOregon Supreme Court · 2016
- Tri-County Metro. Transp. Dist. of Or. (Trimet) v. Amalgamated Transit Union Local 757Oregon Supreme Court · 2018
- Rivas v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District of Oregon v. Amalgamated Transit Union Local 757Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- David Loveall v. Lane County; Steve Mokrohisky, in his personal and official capacity as Lane County Administrator; Heather Buch, in her personal and official capacity as a Lane County Commissioner; Laurie Trieger, in her personal and official capacity as a Lane County Commissioner; and Pat Farr, in his personal and official capacity as a Lane County CommissionerDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2026
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.