Legal Opinion

Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District of Oregon v. Amalgamated Transit Union Local 757

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 18, 2016No. 121215684; A154561PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLagesen, P. J.

This appeal arises from a declaratory judgment action under ORS 28.010. Plaintiff, the Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District of Oregon (TriMet), sought a declaration that the collective bargaining sessions between TriMet’s negotiating team and the bargaining unit for TriMet employees, defendant, the Amalgamated Transit Union (ATU), are not subject to Oregon’s Public Meetings Law, ORS 192.610 to 192.695. On cross-motions for summary judgment, the trial court ruled in favor of TriMet, concluding that the undisputed facts established as a matter of law that the bargaining sessions…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Stevens v. CzerniakOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  2. People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals v. Institutional Animal Care & Use CommitteeOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Citibank South Dakota N.A. v. SantoroCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  4. Vision Realty, Inc. v. KohlerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  5. Harris v. NordquistCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Tri-County Metro. Transp. Dist. of Or. (Trimet) v. Amalgamated Transit Union Local 757Oregon Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Rivas v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API