Legal Opinion

Kinder v. Murray & Sons Construction Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 17, 1998No. 76,296PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

ALLEGRUCCI, J.:

James Kinder, a cement mason, filed a workers compensation claim against Murray & Sons construction Company, Inc., (Murray & Sons) and its insurer, Continental National American Group (Continental), for a knee injury. On the ground that Kinder was employed only by Murray & Sons on the day of his injury, the administrative law judge (ALJ) found that Kinder was not engaged in multiple employment within the meaning of K.S.A. 44-511(b)(7) and computed Kinder s compensation benefits under K.S.A. 44-511(b)(4)(A) and (b)(5) as if he were a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Rush v. Empire Oil & Refining Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1934
  2. Anderson v. Kinsley Sand & Gravel, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  3. Chamberlain v. Bowersock Mills & Power Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1939
  4. Newman v. BennettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  5. Nordstrom v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lowry v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Decker & Mattison Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2002
  3. Attorney General Opinion No., Kansas Attorney General Reports2007
  4. Attorney General Opinion No., Kansas Attorney General Reports2000
  5. Farrell v. U.S.D. 229Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API