Legal Opinion

Decker & Mattison Co. v. Wilson

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 19, 2002No. 86,433PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Brazil, J.:

Decker & Mattison Co., Inc., (D & M) appeals the district court’s decision to quash the garnishment of Charles Wilson’s certificate of deposit (CD). D & M argues the court erred when it determined that proceeds from a workers compensation settlement used to purchase the CD were exempt from garnishment under K.S.A. 2001 Supp. 60-2313(a)(3) and K.S.A. 44-514.

The facts in this case are straightforward. On February 9, 1999, Charles Wilson received $77,449.44 after settling his workers compensation case. Wilson opened a joint savings account in…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Porter v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Walnut Valley State Bank v. StovallSupreme Court of Kansas · 1978
  3. McGhee v. Sinclair Refining Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  4. Moore v. Associated Material & Supply Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1997
  5. Hartford Cas. Ins. Co. v. Credit Union 1 of KansasSupreme Court of Kansas · 1999

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Commerce Bank, N.A. v. BolanderCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2007
  2. Dillon Co. v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2008
  3. In Re TessendorfUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 2011
  4. Stormont-Vail Healthcare v. SieversCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2020
  5. – Leaf Funding, Inc. v. Simmons Medical ClinicCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API