Legal Opinion
Triano v. F.E. Booth Co., Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 30, 1932No. Docket No. 7952PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTyler, P. J.
Action for damages by plaintiff, a minor eight years of age, for injuries received by him in coming in contact with a gear of one of the peeling devices in defendant Booth Company’s canning plant.
The action was first brought in Alameda County. The complaint was in two counts. The first alleged that plaintiff became dizzy and was about to fall and to save himself from striking the floor he ran his hand into the gear, resulting in the. injuries, complained of. The second count was based upon the attractive nuisance theory. Defendant Booth & Company is a Nevada corporation. The ease was…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bradley v. RosenthalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Castle v. . NoyesNew York Court of Appeals · 1856
- Emery v. FowlerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1855
- Lamb v. WahlenmaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Hobbs v. Tom Reed Gold Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Panos v. Great Western Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 1943
- Goddard v. Security Title Insurance & Guarantee Co.California Supreme Court · 1939
- Armas v. City of OaklandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Charles H. Duell, Inc. v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1932
- Stafford v. YergeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.