Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Chadwick

California Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1904No. Crim. No. 1073PublishedCited by 13 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order denying a new trial. "William P. Lawlor, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

The charge against the defendant was sending by telegraph a false and forged message, purporting to be from another person. The information was in the language following:—

“The People of the State of California against Ernest Moore Chadwick, in the Superior Court of the City - and County of San Francisco, State of California, the 28th day of March, A. D. 1901. Ernest Moore Chadwick is accused by the district attorney by this information of the crime of felony, to wit: Sending by telegraph a false and forged message purporting to be from another person, committed as foL lows: The said Ernest…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Ray v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  2. People v. ChadwickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
  3. Cody v. Justice CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  4. People v. CryderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  5. State v. TurlokMontana Supreme Court · 1926

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API