Legal Opinion

People v. Miller

California Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1889No. 20593PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtSharpstein, J.

Appellant and his wife were tried and convicted of criminal conspiracy. The information upon Which they were tried states that “H. Miller and Minnie Miller, being then and there husband and wife, are accused by the district attorney of the said county [San Diego] by this information of the crime of criminal conspiracy.”

The minutes of the court show that after the defendants had been found guilty by the verdict of a jury, and *108their motion for a new trial denied, they appeared for sentence, when the following proceedings were had. We copy from the minutes: “The court at this time sentences…

2Cited by23 opinions

  1. State v. PhillipsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. Jones v. MonsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
  3. People v. PierceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Dawson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1926
  5. People v. LittleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API